"Government Regulations" have been the scapegoat of Republican politics for the last 30 years, and when you govern like Republicans, you can understand why the public has such low regard for our Republic government. Proposition 101, like Hank Paulson and his millionaire bank-CEO cronies, prevents more regulations on another powerful and protected industry, medical insurance:
Known by its supporters as Medical Choice for Arizona or the Freedom to Choose Act will be on the November 4, 2008 ballot in Arizona as a citizen-initiated constitutional amendment.
The supporters say their goal is to "prevent socialized medicine or
further heavy regulation of medical care and health insurance" in the
state. Titled "Arizona - Freedom of Choice in Health Care Act" and
advanced by Medical Choice for Arizona, the measure aims to prevent
"many of the abuses associated with socialized medicine and restricting
its form to either residual welfare or a voucher system."[1]
And the opposition?
- An Amendment limiting future legislation is dangerous. No one
can predict what laws may be needed to improve the health of Arizonans.
- The Amendment will not assure one's freedom to choose a
personal physician, but will prevent the state from creating a system
assuring everyone access to the care they require.
- Arizonans who now rely on Medicare or Medicaid could lose coverage.
- Passage of a Constitutional Amendment in Arizona would limit
legislative options. It will increase the abuses that private
practitioners, hospitals, and patients now suffer from private
insurance carriers. The industry dictates reimbursement, determines the
services patients receive, and dictates who shall be granted or denied
access to care.[2]
- The language of the amendment is ambiguous or "murky" which
could lead to the courts having to do the final interpretation on what
it means.[4]
Recent Comments